BARKAT HUSSAIN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Section 4 [Because it could not distinguish or modify the appeal of the Service Tribunal Service Tribunal before its amendment in 1987, except that it was a mandatory dismissal, removal, reduction of office or mandatory retirement from the Service Tribunal, With the authority to hear appeals against the imposition of such penalties and to decide whether the fine has been properly imposed and upon reaching that conclusion, it can rightfully state that the civil servant Was wrongfully convicted, the service tribunal was also entrusted with the responsibility. Option to reduce dismissal, dismissal, post office or mandatory retirement penalty if it is found that the penalties imposed on civil servants are excessive.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
