Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AMANULLAH KHAN versus MUHAMMAD AFSAR KHAN


Section 4 Appeal to the Service Tribunal by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1976, Section 21 (2) Police Rules, 1934, R138 (2) Police Officer who benefited from the treatment of the department before filing such appeal. Was not raised. Therefore, it is objectionable to not take advantage of departmental measures that in the Police Rules, 1934, there was no departmental treatment available to the police officer on the order of promotion promulgated in the discipline cases by the Inspector General of Police Validity Police officers. Was enraged. Explanation of the relevant police act and police rules of public servants under the extension of Article 21 (2), Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act, 1976, all the police officers were run under this Act and their affairs were dealt with. Rules made under the Police Act or Police Rules do not apply

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Sanjwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.