Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUSTAFA QURESHI versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD

Section 7 AJA and Kashmir Appointment and Service Rules, Terms of 1977, R8 Kashmir Service Rules, Volume 11, R24 Confirmation of Sanitary Determination of Employment Appointment, which was initially made on 27 7 1975 Regularly made on 5 5 1980, although the appointment of co-employees was made before the employees in 6 2 1974, they were confirmed on 16 5 1983, the employee claimed sanity on the co-workers on that basis. That his service was confirmed and that he had success after regularly passing the prescribed test before co-workers. And interviews while the services of co-workers were confirmed at an interim stage. The employee claimed sanity on the basis of the terms of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 and Azad Jammu and Kashmir Appointment and Service Rules, 1977 according to which the employee was seniority. In order to determine from the date of the regular appointment of employment in the department, the claim of the employees was denied which the provisions of the AC claimed were T, 1976 and Rolls 1977 were not applicable to the case of employees. At the time of his appointment, it was stated that the Act and the rules were not in force, and shortly after his appointment, the employees of the participating company claimed that the parties had entered service before the enactment of the Act. , 1976 and Rules, 1977, in their case the enforcement of sanity would be the same as that provided by the Kashmir Service Rules which existed at the time of enrollment in their service and the Rule 24 of the Kashmir Service Rules, Rule 2 Also said The internationality of the competing parties will be determined by the date of their entry into the service and will not be confirmed. advocates from Jaranwala lawyer