An FIR was filed 4/5 days after the definition of evidence of failure to be effective on the charge of confirming adulteration of section 10 (3) Criminal Code (V9 1898), section 417 (2A) and Such a delay was not adequately explained. The victim was tested 5 days after the incident when the victim's father was not presented as a witness in court, while his daughter was subjected to rape, when Victim suffered no injuries during the alleged abuse case. Didn't come The medical report also states that no sign of torture or injury was found on the victim, such as the serious suspicion of being alone, when the alleged crime of rape was reported as the way the prosecution. A witness was made who gave an account in honor. At the scene of the incident, it was suspected when he was a resident of another town, about three kilometers away from the affected city, that the prosecution did not bother to dress the affected girl who was wearing it at the time. Incident, which can play an important role in rape, especially when it is said to be similarly stained with semen and blood. Section 1, according to the statement of the victim, has recorded its statement before the magistrate under CR PC, but the magistrate said that such statement was not examined before the court to prove the prosecution. Could not be prosecuted, in such circumstances the sole testimony of the prosecution could not be believed, it depended on the facts and circumstances of each case, and the court had to determine it on the basis of the whole evidence on record. Hearing Trial
