MUKHTIAR AHMED SHAIKH versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW, ISLAMABAD
Section 3A (2) (A) and (C) members of a Bench of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 203D and 203D Shariat Review Petition Service Tribunal disagreed with the view that the decision was made at any point In section 3A (2) (c) of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, it is permissible to represent the equality of Islam among all human beings in the sense that all human beings are equal and thus the chairman cannot be entitled to any preferential treatment. Are. That the Chairman cannot be equated with two members of the same Bench, the Chairman cannot enjoy any preferential authority in the decision of the Service Tribunal Judgment. The concept of equality between the human beings was entered into the Holy Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet. Was. Islam strongly supported the notion of equality between mankind, regardless of their color, race, gender or any other consideration, and was entitled to equal protection of the law, and the Chairman of the Survey The CE Tribunal was no exception to the issue of giving priority to the rule / law was alien to the Chief Justice of a High Court, the Federal Shariah Court, and even the Supreme Court, who, along with all other members of the Bench, had equal jurisdiction. Enjoyed options such as the Section 3A (2) (C) Service Tribunals Act, 1973, which doubled the opinion of the chairman and made it a jurisdiction. The fate of Amla was decided solely on his power, allowing for the integration of Islam Shariah revision petition. The Federal Government is directed to amend section 3A (2) (c) of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. To take necessary steps to ensure that Islam is in harmony with Islam before June 30, 2014.
