In section 354, all the witnesses of the complainant who tried to accompany the victim to the victim also unanimously stated in their own statements that the accused was trying to commit adultery with his trial court after removing the victim's shalwar. Was accused of trying to commit adultery. The victim, who was convicted under Section 18 of the Enforcement Hood Ordinance 1979, was neither charged by the complainant in her complaint, nor did the witnesses try to commit adultery in the affected case. Was charged. The court did not allege the accused-related crime, which was read with Section 3177, PPC Com. The plaintiff did not present any independent witness in support of the charge. One witness was the complainant's wife, while the other was the real complainant. Was the winner. The independent witness testified in his cross-examination that he had not witnessed the incident. The complainant had never received the alleged victim medically. After the incident, the investigating complaint and the rest of the witnesses did not specifically say that the accused had left his shalwar. The accused did not take the alleged victim in his house or any other premises and no one was involved in the open area with the girl. Could not afford to commit the crime. Even if the alleged act of the accused dealing with a crime under the terms of section 354, PPC, is considered, it is not based on the complainant's evidence beyond a reasonable shadow of a doubt. Was done, the complainant never charged the investigating officer with the victim's shalwar. The intoxication of his intention
