SALEEM AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PAKISTAN
Article 203 D West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Section 10 (4) Shariah Application Marriage Resolution The Judge / Judge of the pre-trial proceedings was empowered to testify with and without the husband's consent. At the first stage of the recorded case, Khulla's decree. The applicants of Islam intend that a judge / judge who had previously prayed for the dissolution of the marriage on the basis of a khalid was not authorized to make such an order in favor of the wife if she did not agree with the husband. ? Section 10 (4) of the Family Court Act 1964 was against the integration of Islam because it ordered the Family Court to like and dislike the first phase of the trial if reconciliation failed in the case. Without recording evidence in which the husband and wife were refused to compromise, where the husband was not willing to accept compensation for the purposes of his wife and he did not want her to enter into a marital relationship. Refused to be released and she refused to divorce, the question was how should she do it? Action for the wife; is it permissible to leave a wife in the dark who does not live happily or does not fulfill her marital obligations? Should she be pushed back by her husband to stay tongue-tied, tight-lipped, depressed, depressed, unlucky throughout life. Should he put it at his mercy, according to the law, is the danger of the life of the infidel. Was such a situation morally justified by any standards? Doesn't such a situation make her want to defeat marital peace and security? If that is the case
