Advantage of Suspicion for Defining Section 10 Adultery or Adultery Bill Evidence It is impossible to take advantage of the suspect's story because there was a three-day delay in filing the FIR and the delay given by the complainant. The explanation for this was not valid. The alleged rapist was allegedly raped by the complainant's wife, but he retained the mother's case for three days so long that the complainant was immediately called by police to file an FIR. The station should have gone, the prosecution's story was incredible, and the witnesses were concerned that no one in the complainant had witnessed the incident or heard of it, because the witness was a lady doctor. But no one was exposed, he allegedly defied the victim's story by saying that he had a fresh scar on his body and that No sign of Violence was present, the clothes of the victims were not clean and they were not torn or stained. The accused, the trial court was not justified in sentencing and the trial court had sentenced the accused. The conviction and sentence were set aside, and he was acquitted of the charge by giving him the benefit of the doubt.
