KH. MUSHTAQ AHMED DAR versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Article 44 & Written Retention of Written Request Civil Service Employee Subordinate Judiciary The upgrading of the staff of the district judiciary before the allowance law for the said staff was that their positions were not upgraded and There were no allowances for subordinate judicial employees. Employees of all departments of Pakistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir were getting concessions on the basis of Pakistan's equality. The Welderty Services Tribunal could not provide direction under section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, if necessary, the High Court was a suitable forum for any direction. Instead, the government upgraded the positions of employees of other departments, but employees of the subordinate judiciary were not given the same benefits. Were not To be upgraded due to different names, the government did not deny the applicants' claims contradicting the positions of employees of other departments. The government was directed to employ applicants in accordance with the law. The positions were to be upgraded and likewise the other employees were retained along with their counterpart in which the Punjab applicants. In Azad Jammu and Kashmir, the subordinate judicial staff was entitled to an allowance, as was given to the subordinate judicial staff in Pakistan, according to which the written request was accepted.
