The prosecution's testimony was affirmed in the challan charged with Section 190 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), sections 147, 148, 149, 427 and 452 riots, common objects, adultery and domestic crime, of which five (5) have now Until now, only one witness's statement was shown as an eyewitness to the incident and the rest of the eyewitness testimony had to be recorded later with no credible evidence. It is on record to show that the accused were involved in the commission of the order in connection with the summons, which should have been approved after the statements of all the witnesses, including the Investigation Officer, were taken by the complainant. There was no evidence to support the Gaya version. The request for timely summoning of the accused on record was premature and could not be allowed, in light of the circumstances of the trial, the trial court recorded the untimely order. And the review was rejected for appropriate reasons
