Sections 2 (2 (b), 4 304, 8l i and 101010 Qatal Um Emad, mixture of trespassers, plea of guilty, reduction of sentence) confessed to the accused and confessed that he had committed the crime of killing his brother and wife. Admittedly, the trial court can also record the charges. The guilty plea was granted. Even though the perpetrators are not bound to accept the plea of guilty, the sentence is usually related to the crime or life imprisonment. In cases that should not be based on a plea of guilt, in the circumstances of the trial, the defendant must file evidence and judge the case in light of the evidence, so present Which way the trial court properly adopted the case, the interest of justice sought to consider the guilt of the accused on the basis of the prosecution and the evidence of the prosecution, as well as the complainant's confession. Presenting a regular statement of the incident, he reiterated the preliminary version presented by him in his preliminary report to the Chief in his examination. Both said that the witnesses were subjected to a lengthy investigation, but Defendant could not be taken out of his mouth by any means for eye witnesses to stand on their first stand. Waho said, "The evidence of the circumstances has led to his complicity with the complainant and the father of the deceased and there is no reason that the father will accuse his real son of the false murder of his second son, other prosecutors." The accused, who was the mother and mother-in-law of the accused, would never make false accusations against his son, without which the prosecutor carefully and confidently intended to murder his daughter.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
