A. VIII, R11 and Section 11 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), suit for resolution 42, rejection of scope race Judesta, property dispute resolution decided between the parties, within the plaintiff's knowledge Were good Defendants never challenged a decision that was passed in favor of the defendants to all property decisions and agreements that were appropriate. The principle of the judiciary was based on the wisdom that the final decision would be linked to a decision by a court of jurisdiction in which the individual should not. A court of competent jurisdiction between the parties or their successors shall be refused to make the decision twice, unless the same matter is reversed or canceled, and will remain in the field for a time when it has been proved that The matter was finally settled in the matter. Once a competent jurisdiction is resolved by a court, the provisions of O VII, R must be appealed to the trial court. 11, the CPC had initially waived the suit in front of the plaintiffs' record for termination of litigation and did not require the recording of evidence or the appellate court properly appreciated the case. And rejected the claimant requesting the provisions of O VII, R 11, the CPC revision was dismissed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
