TALEH MUHAMMAD versus FATEH MUHAMMAD KHAN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (5) contempt of court Act (XII of 1926), a contempt of court petition for the action of the President of the Workers' Union following the decision of the case by the Section 3 Tribunal, to the Registrar of Trade Unions Wrote a letter in which he challenged. Not only was Mans R.A.'s letter lacking in writing such a letter to the Labor Officer's letter to Lucas Standi regarding the change of labor union officials or interpreting the tribunal decision, but any clear allegation It was also imposed that it was done by the respondent / President. The Workers' Union, which can show that it disobeyed the orders of the Tribunal Notice issued under section 38 (5) of the Ordinance, and the charge against the respondents was subsequently dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Pasni lawyer
