Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LTD., KARACHI versus ALTAF HUSSAIN OURESHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Respondent who has been discharged from Section O15 (4) service, received money as TV license on a bank employee. He was charged with misconduct. Fees respondents were found guilty of domestic investigations based on the allegations leveled against them and were dismissed from the job following a showcase notice, however, the Labor Court accepted the respondents' complaint request and The former was restored to the job with auxiliary benefits. The appellant failed to appear even after two motions but the respondent allegedly used to act, which included clerical and manual duties, the charge sheet did not show when the appellant was concerned. Respondents were accused of possessing illegal money when I was abused, but the inquiry officer found him guilty. Two allegations, namely misconduct and stagnation, led the inquiry officer to consider the external issue, concluding that the respondent was guilty of something he had not been accused of, which naturally led to discriminatory authority. Approved the dismissal order after an unreasonably long delay that restored the order of rehabilitation attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Toru lawyer