Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD IDRIS KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH


Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 199 constitutional jurisdiction, violation of alleged irregularities in promoting employees, was appealed to the Chief Secretary, which was regularly addressed to the employee, which is also on record. Submitted. Through the employee, it was clear that the Chief Secretary had considered the grounds of appeal and his appeal was rejected. Rejecting the employee's appeal, the Chief Secretary wrote in his own hand and the order was informed by the employees acknowledging that no final orders had been approved. , The employees' appeal was dismissed, the employees should have taken advantage of the treatment available to them under the Sindh Services Tribunal Act, 1973. The constitutional application, filed without medical treatment, was dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Moro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.