Find a Lawyer

SOHAIL AKHTAR CHANG versus ABDUL KARIM

R13 (iv) the appellant was considered for promotion, but he was excluded from the effect of clause (iv) of R13 relating to a public servant which was not considered for promotion, whereas in the present case the appellant. He was considered for development, therefore, he said that principle had no help in his case

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• NIZAMUDDIN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 914
• APPARELS (PVT.) LTD. v. KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION 2014 YLR 917
• MUHAMMAD NASEEM v. MUHAMMAD IMRAN 2014 MLD 927
• MUHAMMAD HANIF alias POCHO v. State 2014 PCrLJ 928
• LALIO v. 1ST ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DISTRICT BADIN 2014 MLD 936
• PERVEZ HUSSAIN v. STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN through Governor 2014 CLD 941
• Syed MUNAWAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. Syed NUSRAT HUSSAIN 2014 CLC 945
• Syed ZUBAIR AHMED HASHMI v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT through District Officer 2014 YLR 947

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

best law firm from Mian Chunnu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes