PERVEZ HUSSAIN versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH GOVERNOR
Sections 40A, 40, 35 and 34 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request Complaint against State Bank of Pakistan State Bank of Pakistan against the conduct of banking company, the applicant's duty to complain about alleged fraudulent commission against the bank. Of The State Bank of Pakistan's stand with the request of the State Bank of Pakistan to launch an investigation into the alleged fraudulent investigations was that since the alleged fraud case was pending in two separate civil suits. It will not be suitable for the state. The Bank of Pakistan, which was sub-judice for taking any action in this matter, because the State Bank had assigned the applicant's complaint not to take further action, no civil suit was impeded by the State Bank. ? Any inquiry or inquiry was made on the terms of the Ordinance of Banking Companies, 1962, because the State Bank was not supportive of the dispute, and even there was no prevention. In this case, the State Bank of Pakistan's order to operate was a regulator of the affairs of the banking companies operating in the country, as it was the primary responsibility and responsibility of any account holder or depositor to appear on any complaint. To which the State Bank of Pakistan was entrusted with the responsibility. Under the Ordinance of the Banking Companies, 1962, a controlling and regulating authority and its legal obligation were to give the banking company necessary instructions to prevent the banking company from operating in such a manner as to the interests of the banking company. Was biased or hurtful. Also with common storage
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
