Find a Lawyer

SYED ZUBAIR AHMED HASHMI versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT THROUGH DISTRICT OFFICER

Claims 39, 42 and 54 of the plaintiffs' claim for dismissal of the documents claimed and claimed possession of the suit plot, and also demanded that the allotment and subdivision be canceled in three plots and that the defendants. The allotment of names is illegal. The allotment of the underground plot was canceled and taken on an empty pool and divided into three units as the plaintiff states in its written statement. The claim was made and the suit plot filed in favor of the former owner was canceled and the new plot was canceled. Instead he was allotted the previous owner had no title, right or interest in the suit plot, which was taken in an empty pool and was divided into three plots and the defendants were allotted. Because the house was not built under the plaintiff's case. He was demolished and the suit filed by him was returned. The plaintiff was not entitled to occupy the plot. The suit was dismissed.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• SOHAIL AKHTAR CHANG v. ABDUL KARIM 2014 PLC(CS) 933
• LALIO v. 1ST ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DISTRICT BADIN 2014 MLD 936
• PERVEZ HUSSAIN v. STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN through Governor 2014 CLD 941
• Syed MUNAWAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. Syed NUSRAT HUSSAIN 2014 CLC 945
• JALAT KHAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 949
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, HYDERABAD v. HYDERABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY (HESCO), HYDERABAD 2014 PTD 951
• UMAIR AHMED KHAN v. YOUSUF ALI KHAN GHOURI 2014 MLD 953
• ZAMIR IQBAL KHAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 954

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

property advocate from Shorkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes