Find a Lawyer

APPARELS (PVT.) LTD. versus KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION

Section 23 The plaintiff's compensation for the land received was that the land was acquired but there was no money as payment for the compensation The defendants claimed that after completing all the rituals, the land was acquired for road widening And the question of payment of compensation at the market rate does not arise. No private land can be used for public purposes without any acquisition of land. No land can be acquired without proper and proper compensation. The plaintiff was the owner of the proper property and if he says that if for any public purpose If the land is acquired, they are entitled to compensation at the market price. The compensation paid to the plaintiffs must be determined under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 The plaintiffs were not used by the Land Authority and would be entitled to receive compensation if they were actually used.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• Barrister WALEED KHANZADA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence 2014 CLC 903
• TANVEER POULTRY SERVICES v. K & N\'S POULTRY FARMS through Managing Partner 2014 MLD 905
• FAROOQ v. Mst. ZAHABA BIBI 2014 PCrLJ 907
• NIZAMUDDIN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 914
• MUHAMMAD NASEEM v. MUHAMMAD IMRAN 2014 MLD 927
• MUHAMMAD HANIF alias POCHO v. State 2014 PCrLJ 928
• SOHAIL AKHTAR CHANG v. ABDUL KARIM 2014 PLC(CS) 933
• LALIO v. 1ST ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DISTRICT BADIN 2014 MLD 936

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

top civil advocates from More kunda lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes