Sections 302, 149, 353, 324 and 404 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6 (a) (b) assault or criminal force, to prevent a civil servant from discharging his duties. Co-operation, unlawful use of property and the act of terrorism. Definition of evidence The benefit of the suspect was identified by two of the five defendants, two by the complainant, but the complainant could not provide the characteristics and statistics of the remaining three unknown suspects mentioned in the FIR, a weak vehicle type at midnight. Was told about seeing a person from an acre or two acres that it was suspected of recovering Kalashnikov from the livestock of the accused that the accused had also been acquitted under section 13 (e). After a six-day delay about the Arms Ordinance, 1965, the identity of the accused was paraded, the prosecutor, including all 13 witnesses, examined when the delay was not explained. Eyewitnesses, but no concrete or unidentified evidence was brought to the record to prove the charges against the accused, identifying the suspect at a distance from the scene, was extremely suspicious. And after about 6 months, the identity of the suspect through the prosecution's witnesses was also suspicious. There were several circumstances in which to raise suspicion in the prosecution case, the accused was entitled to the benefit of the doubt, reasonable shadow of the prosecution. Beyond failing to prove charges against the accused, the verdict was set aside, the accused was acquitted of the charges, and he was also ordered to be released in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
