SAE versus ZULFIQAR ALI
O XLl A 19 Revision restitution that was rejected for non-prosecution The substantial request was merely that the applicant believed that his lawyer's clerk could not see this cause from the list and that no claim was made that the lawyer Had ever tried to use reason fist and was not assisted by any lawyer applying for rehabilitation or by a clerk's affidavit that it was the primary lawyer's responsibility to note the matter and Was not employed by a clerk to assist him. The usual case would not be to dismiss its basic duty advice as it was shown in the application for rehabilitation, therefore, neither was sufficient nor good applicant, therefore, no case for restoration of the revision request. Failed to submit which was excluded for illegal prosecution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Akhora Khattak lawyer