MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH versus MUHAMMAD RIAZ
OXVII, R 3 Plaintiff's evidence was discontinued and his claim dismissed because of his failure to present evidence, although he was granted numerous occasions that the plaintiff's confession was that he was ill that day, when The evidence was closed and, therefore, no medical certificate was shown about the plaintiff's illness in the trial before the defendant's illness was closed. This type of certificate was also not presented to the Appellate Court and this was the first time that a private practitioner had been sent to the High Court for review. Placed before it, the appellate court had passed the disputed order on September 12, 1991, and the certificate presented to the High Court was issued on November 19, 1991, which meant that after the defendants dismissed the plaintiff's appeal ground. Was obtained. Thus the non-production of certificates under one of the two courts under the auspices and before its issuance was a high consideration.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Nawab Shah lawyer