HAKIM KHAN versus THE STATE
Guaranteed Section 497; Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Penalty for Section 377 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VIT of 1979), two of three witnesses charged with physical disorder in filing Section 11 FIR The prosecution's case was not supported. The complainant and the victim testified that the person initially named as the accused was not present at the time and place of the incident, provided new eyewitness testimony and new location of his presence through the complainant's subpoena. The medical evidence of the deceased's ass was of suspicious character, so it was not available to reasonably believe that the accused had committed the crime he was accused of.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Khyber Agency lawyer
