MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 The members of the bail were qualified witnesses under police law and the prosecution could not be dismissed simply because the public The witnesses had. The riots come forward to support the fact that there is no legal mandate that the entire quantity of the drugs recovered should be sent to the chemical: investigation or if the accused has been charged with possession or sale of such drugs. He will only be responsible to that extent. The amount sent to the chemical inspection, as long as it can be proved that the quantity sent for the chemical test was extracted from the recovered drug, was delayed by the law for the purpose of bail by the law. It was not delayed. In the circumstances the accused's plea was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Babri Banda lawyer
