Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AKHTAR ALAM versus SHABBIR


Sindh Public Property (Termination of Expulsions) Act 1975, Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Applicants' dismissal responds to the dismissal of the petitioner by the Sindh Plaintiffs Authority, Sindh Public Property Act (1975). On the day of the termination of the notice of expulsion, though the service of the applicants was allegedly enforced by the respondents authority on February 7, the seven-day notice period will expire on February 14 and, as such, the respondent authority May take action on February 15th. On February 14, a day was too soon to be compulsory, and it was not comprehensible to have an unlawful action by the accountable authority and otherwise, under the provisions of section 5 of the 1975 Act, the law was not sustainable as it was not strictly followed. Was. Action was taken against the applicants either without serving the necessary notice or alternatively, before the expiry of the notice period.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Patika lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.