The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 2 (xxviii) and a 25 employee plea complaint by the employee to retain evidence of the increase showed that the employee's essential duties were not supervision and administration in nature, such as the employer's bank employee In its evidence it said that it prepared vouchers, bills, made entries in ledgers and counters on other documents, prepared bank statements and other various academic work besides examining the employee by the bank. On which the employee also admitted that the bank had no lawyer. The Labor Appellate Tribunal, which was assigned to Grade 11 and Grade III officers, did not find any issue to obstruct that the duties of the employees were primarily of the nature of the scholar, he was a "laborer" and the ordinance, 1969. This was an application under Section 25A of the Act. Maintainable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
