MUHAMMAD USMAN versus THE STATE
Criminal Code (CRPC) Section 340 (2) Section 342, CRPC's statements of the accused were recorded after the implementation of the Code of Conduct (Amendment) Ordinance 1985, under which PCP 540 Subsection (2) was added, but no questions were asked in terms of section 340 (2), section (2) of CCPC section 340; CCP must comply with its letter and spirit. And follow it to justify its action. When a mandatory clause was not strictly prohibited, it would terminate the trial in which case the prejudice would appear on the face of the record and consequently the conviction of the accused was set aside and the trial. Was sent to the Sessions Court for a pre-trial trial. The above mentioned illegal act was committed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Machh lawyer
