Find a Lawyer

KARAMKER (PVT.) LTD. versus AKHTAR BANO

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 and 21 were transformed into a residential tenant by a tenant having an effect as a residential, residential one, in the same commercial use without the consent of the landlord. Was presented to the tenant. Landlody and her husband had stated on oath before the tenant that the tenant had received a notice from the resident about the transfer of the property to the commercial, but had not sent a response and her husband had, however, crossed. He was at length at the inquiry, but no question was kept about the notice he allegedly sent to the tenant, but he could not prove in the record that the under-lying residential house, It was taken for commercial use, according to evidence on record by the rent controller The question was fixed and did not promote it. According to the evidence, there was no merit in the appeal which was dismissed under the circumstances tax advocates from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer