MUHAMMAD SABIR versus THE STATE
The precautionary deliberative report against the accused submitted under Section 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 Section 14 Act was vague and general and there was no specific precedent to enable the court to conclude that He was a habitual offender and repeatedly or repeatedly committed a fight with him. No instance of time, date and place was cited in this regard by the people or alleged rioting, in which two cases in which the applicant's name appeared as the accused and under section 107/117 Thirdly, the PC did not, nor could it, examine its definition. The words used in the section 14 order under section 14 were `` exceptionally criminal ender, illegal, unnecessary and without jurisdiction ''
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Samma Satta lawyer
