MUHAMMAD MANZOOR versus ZEENAT BEGUM
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 and 21 The son of the landlord, Prof. Llandlaidy, who was already in the service of a homeopath doctor as per his personal need, did not establish that he would begin medical practice in the disputed premises of Landlady's son. For those who need premises, they did not submit their affidavit in support of the eviction request, although in each case it was not necessary to enter the affidavit by someone who needed the premises, In cases where the premises are needed by a person, especially for use by a person Wati was His competence, skill and experience, such a person is already in the job, his affidavit must be filed to prove his final claim. Such affidavit was not filed, except for the mother and brother. The filing of an oath of a daughter-in-law does not meet the needs of the landlords. Beta son
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Sanghar lawyer
