Find a Lawyer

MOEEN WEAVING FACTORY versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE

Article 46 (5) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application to reimburse employees for reinstatement The applicants / employer of the applicant had challenged the order to reimburse the employees as reinstatement. Stressful and strained relationships between the worker and the employer will not allow the factory to create and maintain a peaceful, supportive and conducive environment work Reimbursement of employees as compensation for thirty months' salary as industrial Was made under section 46 (5). The Relations Ordinance, a decision passed by the Labor Court in 1969, could not be declared an illegal decision because the constitutional application was dismissed. \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• Syed ASAD RAZA NAQVI v. Mst. SAIMA FATIMA 2014 MLD 254
• BEEJAL v. State 2014 PCrLJ 261
• Mirza AFZAL BAIG v. MUDABBIR ALI KHAN 2014 CLC 261
• KHURRAM NASEEMUDDIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Director General FIA Islamabad 2014 PLD 264
• Dr. SAMRINA HASHMI v. PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (CENTRE) 2014 PLD 268
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ SADDIDY v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU OF PAKISTAN (NAB) 2014 MLD 276
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. State 2014 PCrLJ 279
• AYAZ ALI v. State 2014 PLD 282

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

us immigration advocates from Miran Shah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes