Find a Lawyer

DR. SAMRINA HASHMI versus PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (CENTRE)

Sections 42 and 54 were members of the Civil Procedure for the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0xxiiX, RR1 and 2 suit declarations and interim injunctions for injunction, individual and collective rights granted to the scope plaintiff Pakistan Medical Association. , Which prosecuted him for deportation. The right of membership of the association is subject to the mandate and command of the association and the right of the individual is to comply with the demands and orders of an organization. The mechanism and body corporate or the work of any association cannot be subjected to the alleged rights. ? For persons whose rights have not yet been determined that the mandatory injunction to be issued at an early stage and the continuance of the plaintiff will not be in favor of the Association whose purpose is to decide on the application for interim injunction Will not determine the fate of the matter. Results and hits were only temporary The requests were rejected in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• BEEJAL v. State 2014 PCrLJ 261
• Mirza AFZAL BAIG v. MUDABBIR ALI KHAN 2014 CLC 261
• KHURRAM NASEEMUDDIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Director General FIA Islamabad 2014 PLD 264
• MOEEN WEAVING FACTORY v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE 2014 PLC 267
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ SADDIDY v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU OF PAKISTAN (NAB) 2014 MLD 276
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. State 2014 PCrLJ 279
• AYAZ ALI v. State 2014 PLD 282
• CITIBANK NA v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE 2014 PTD 284

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

registration advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes