Section 324, 337 F (iii) and 337 F (Iiv) Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), Section 225 Attempt to commit murder, non-confrontation, and Defiance of non-Jifa modia evidence, improper motivation error, non-bailable The accused was convicted by the Evidence Trial Court and sentenced to various terms. The motive of the incident was mysteriously surrounded and the witness did not highlight the motive, but was not motivated by the enmity until it was fully explained by the evidence and its degree. ? It was such a serious event that in retaliation, people could take extreme measures to eliminate a person. The delay in filing the FIR was fully stated and the testimony of the four witnesses and the medical officers was in no way inferior and they gave evidence that proved to be perfectly straightforward and the High Court denied. Brush aside just on the basis that they are interconnected and even an interesting witness can be a true witness in the case of Sarko. Documents pertaining to the case have been received which clearly mention the nature of the injuries and injuries. It was, therefore, not surprising that the accused was taken or the misguided High Court refused to intervene in the sentence imposed by the trial court and the appeal was dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
