Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ SADDIDY versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU OF PAKISTAN (NAB)

Sections 9 (a) and (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request Bail, Grant of Further Inquiry, Applicant's Case was not named in the FIR and in a complaint filed by the Security and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Or his name was not mentioned anywhere in his name. Reference filed by NAB Although the applicant's name was shown for the first time by the NAB after submitting the supplemental report, the sub-reference was silent on the applicant's role in the alleged crime, the NAB said in the supplemental reference. Other co-accused mentioned above were also mentioned. Clients need further investigation to determine the applicant's guilt or innocence in the fraudulent impact case.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• Mirza AFZAL BAIG v. MUDABBIR ALI KHAN 2014 CLC 261
• KHURRAM NASEEMUDDIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Director General FIA Islamabad 2014 PLD 264
• MOEEN WEAVING FACTORY v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE 2014 PLC 267
• Dr. SAMRINA HASHMI v. PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (CENTRE) 2014 PLD 268
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. State 2014 PCrLJ 279
• AYAZ ALI v. State 2014 PLD 282
• CITIBANK NA v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE 2014 PTD 284
• ALTAF HUSSAIN v. State 2014 PLD 287

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

tax advocates from Sidhnoti lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes