TAMAS MASIH versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 304 of the complainant and the prosecution witnesses who gave regular account of the incident were the accused and the son of the victim, as they were both natural witnesses during the robbery attempt to snatch the knife. The defendant also made a judicial assurance of his presence at the time of his presence; both the prosecution's witnesses made a permanent calculation of the incident, their testimony was reliable and both the prosecution's witnesses testified. The defendant had stated the facts and stated that the accused, who was his father, had suspected this His victim's mother had made illicit contact with his maternal uncle, and the suspect accused of killing his mother, who confessed to the murder, explained that when he went to bed at night When CK unexpectedly returned from the outside, he found his victim. The wife is in a position to compromise with her cousin, and seeing that the GOT overcomes the most provocative and lost senses and self, and kills his wife to death under intense and sudden provocation, The perpetrator of the murder under serious provocation and was the witness of the complainant and the prosecutor who was the real son of the accused who forgave his father; In keeping with this, the conviction of the accused was maintained under Section 4304, Part I, PPC but the accused Sentencing reduced the penalty and the penalty was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Parachinar lawyer