Find a Lawyer

KHUDA BAKHSH KHAN versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAHAWALPUR

Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 Section 31 Punjab Local Council (vote of confidence against Chairman and Vice Chairman) Rules, 1980, R3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Movement of motion against non-confidence motion was unsuccessful 12 1 1989 The meeting on and after the no-confidence motion was convened on 16 5 1991 and the second or subsequent no-confidence eligibility was not eligible if within thirty days after every six-month interval on the date. Was not moved. Prior to relinquishing the motion, after the first motion of no-confidence motion failed on 12 August 1989, the subsequent motion could be transferred within a period of six months to thirty days, after a period of six months, The current movement can be moved in 1991, it can be shifted to 13 4 1991. 12 5 In 1991, the summit, called for to consider the motion of no-confidence, will go beyond thirty days after the interval of six months. Next, the provision of section 31 (3), Punjab Local Government Ordinance, Section 31, Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979, was not compulsory in the sense that it was not compulsory; The confidence movement will be understood. The meeting convened on 169 1991 for consideration of competent and motionless distrust was rejected and rejected, so it was declared without legal authority and with no legal effect. advocate from Sanjwal lawyer