Find a Lawyer

SHER MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

The prosecution witnesses of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34, 324/34, 32C / 34 and, 452/34, who confessed that they were closely related to the deceased, made statements that fit their design. And varied their testimony to bolster the prosecution's case. Regardless of the truth and the statements made by them earlier, it was alleged that when he saw the deceased at a questionable location with his daughter in his own home, he fled, but the accused pursued and participated. With the help of the accused, he was the real brother of the accused and after the murder of the victim he also killed his own daughter. The legacy presented by the accused created confidence in the father's daughter. It would be natural for your daughter to be provoked by seeing her daughter compromise in her own home. Of such a serious nature that any of the co-accused accused of the brothers were also found to have been conveyed by the parties to the W which had already been compromised and the complaining party suspected the circumstances. The accused was acquitted, could not be held responsible for the offenses under Section 302/34, the PPC was convicted of the crime and the accused and instead was sentenced under Section 304, Part I. Was gone , PPC and all the accused involved in the case were sentenced to pre-jail term. online advocate from Khair Pur Mir lawyer