Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR AHMAD versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 5 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 161 and 162 Conan Evidence (10 of 1984), Articles 40 and 46 Definition of Evidence Defendant's Testimony was discussed but the accused Trial Court In its judgment against the prosecution, the evidence of the prosecution had not examined the irrelevant and irrelevant material and did not assume that the motive indicated that it had been established even though there was no question. No motive was stated or proved by the prosecution's witnesses, the trial court held that the testimony of the prosecution witnesses listed under section 161, CRPC, contested some of its cross-examination during cross-examination. From prosecution witnesses but because of this the ignorant used the statement in favor of the prosecution ignoring the provisions of the section tion161, such statements as CR PC only under Article 140, Conventions and testimony. The statement (witness) may be used for conflicting purposes or for purposes that are set forth in Articles 40 and 46 of the Owen Evidence Trial Court They are. According to the verdict, the facts that have been proved on the record give rise to suspicions (not reasonable suspicion) that the accused failed to provide any explanation which shows that he has a hand grenade for any lawful purpose, By proving that the prosecution was successful the prosecution had. The explosive substance and the circumstances which led to the reasonable suspicion that the accused does not have a lawful item, it was not one of the law to find these two questions but it was a fact and unless such a search was recorded. No accused can be convicted until that time. property advocate from Chitral lawyer