Find a Lawyer

AHMAD versus NAWAB

Civil Procedure Code Order XXVI (Commission for Investigating Witnesses) of CPC Commissions OXXVI, R9 and Section 100 Local Commissioner's Report and the evidence taken in an earlier case that had been withdrawn As a result, one of the defendants in this case, although a party to the previous case, had the local commissioner's report prepared behind his back which he had no knowledge of the local commissioner's impact report and his The evidence taken will only be the evidence in the case in which they were investigated and in another case it was not the same evidence, unless its teaching Guy was generally not proven unless one of the defendants in this case was a party in which the local commissioner's earlier suit report was behind such a party to which he was unaware. ? Ultimately it cannot be treated as a reasonable piece of evidence to compel him to come to a conclusion. Which was later withdrawn with court leave to re-identify due to identification, in the absence of a record of the first suit brought on file by law, it could not be determined that No action was followed but it could not be ascertained that in the previous case, the courts were demanded by the parties to file objections to the local commissioner's report or to refuse to object to the report. If the objection was raised by, how were those objections when the case was allowed to be withdrawn? ? Raising objections to the Commissioner's report and proof of them best advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer