RASUL BIBI versus QADAR DAD
The Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, was based on Section 15 Evidence Act (1 of 1872), Section 50 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 19081, Section 115) with the plaintiff's relationship with the seller, which the defendant denied. The plaintiff in her statement explicitly denied the claimant's relationship with the ti seller but did not confirm her statement through the second clause that the plaintiff had produced. The exclusions from the registration of the plaintiff were relevant, whereas the persons produced by the defendant were neither relevant nor helpful. On the view of the relationship existing on the record, the plaintiff gave compelling evidence to prove that the defendant could not deny that such evidence was substantiated by the claimant's relationship with the vendor and On the contrary, the decision of the lower appellate court was set aside and the trial court restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chowk Azam lawyer