TNB LIBERTY POWER LTD. versus DIRECTOR OF LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Sections 3 and 9 (1) (2) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 3 and 50 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XIX R 1 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 17 Constitutional Application Maintaining Alternative Remedies Lokso Standi The association's Freedom Trade Union and the Association's Freedom Trade Union Registration Applicant endorsed the authorities' decision on the unilateral issuance of trade union registration certificates. Registered with the Trade Union, the applicant's establishment without the opportunity of a hearing by the applicant's application There was no respondent to the nut, the applicant had no locus stand for filing a constitutional petition, as under Section 50 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, the applicant had a substitute treatment of the appeal before the Labor Court and this That the constitutional petition was inadvertently filed in v. AXIX, R1, CPC's isolation did not require the authorities, nor the employer, to hear the applicant before the registration of the trade union under the law. The trade union is in the same establishment and cannot claim a Lux Standby to challenge the decision of the Registrar. , Only on the basis that he was not provided an opportunity for a hearing or that any objection was not considered before the Registrar before this decision was filed with the person without proper authorization. As such, a contractor (employer) company was required to authorize such person to file an application and the Board of Directors could not
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
