PERVEZ MUSHARRAF versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY INTERIOR
Section 2 Exit Pakistan (Control) Rules, 2010, R2 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 6, 15 and 199 Constitutional Request Political Case Political Crime Exit Control List Naming (\ ECL \) Name in Exit Control List The field for which the applicants were named in the Exit Control List has not been mentioned, so no special ground has been mentioned for deciding to put their name on the list even though the federal government has not mentioned it. It was therefore not necessary to clarify the grounds for exiting the applicant's name. The control list if it believes it is not in the public interest, but the federal government has not made such a debate, and instead simply asserts that the applicant was accused of high treason, a political case. And was a political crime. The government meant that there was no restriction on the reasons for putting the applicant's name on the Exit Control List, which, according to the Federal Government, was in the public interest, in the public interest in high-treason cases. Was included so that the petitioner applied for removal of his name from the Exit Control List to seek reasons to prosecute the high treason suspect but the aforementioned application / review was made in the decisions of the High Courts and pending criminal cases in various courts. The petitioner was also allegedly denied when the applicant There was no hearing right when he applied for his name to be deleted, but his request was summarily rejected at the time of naming the applicant. Exit Control List and when it is deleted from the list
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
