The applicants' jurisdiction, aside from the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition, Declaration of Components, Fraud and Misrepresentation of Components, was that the respondent had agreed to the terms of the plea agreement filed under Section 12 (2). The rules were not complied with, the CPC was rejected as well. The parties settled their dispute outside the court and were compromised and the applicants failed to establish any fraud or misrepresentation made by the defendant on Section 12 (2) of the court, C.P. The proper treatment of the affected party was presented for C. If the order or decision was obtained through fraudulent and misrepresentation of facts, the applicant had any allegation of fraud or misrepresentation by the trial court in sanctioning the unclean order. Was not put in place when it went the wrong way to achieve this task. After respondents' refusal to comply with the terms and conditions of Section 12 (2) of the agreement, rather than filing the execution patent, the CPC was lost in the present case when the applicant sought the issue and He could not find his remedy, appealing to the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the agreement. The order was upheld, alleging that it was obtained through fraud and misrepresentation of facts. The constitutional application was dismissed under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
