INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. versus SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Section 2 (xxxii) and G 33 Complaint Applicant / Employee who initially worked with \ C Limited with claimed that after his appointment, he was treated with \ I Limited of. Went and both companies were part of J Group Companies \ Employee admitted that the case was against Limited C Limited \ Both companies were privately held companies, and when the complaint was filed before the Labor Court, None of these companies were made a party, and only the directors and managers were sued. In order to sue the two companies, which were independent jurisdictions that the employee was a "laborer," instead of abolishing the entire proceeding, the High Court directed the employee to set aside both of them. Enter the modified title, enforcing the companies. Fresh notices will be issued at his address, as a party and then by the Labor Court. And after a defense formed by such companies, the Labor Court will settle the case according to the law. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
