Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI MAHER versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, KARACHI

Article 199 Constitutional Request Sindh Road Transport Corporation Contract Employees Recruitment Claims for Claimant's Notice of Period, Grants, and Vacation Enrollment without prior notice to the employment period of such corporation shows that applicants As a regular employee of the corporation, they have already received their due in the form of a Golden Handshake Corporation, under which the contractual applicants were re-employed on the condition that their service was at any time subject to notice. Can be closed with or without cause when suspending intervals Applicants were not entitled to any guarantees or leave the Investment Corporation. The applicant's service was not legally obligated to issue him a month ago notice or for some reason, so the High Court dismissed the constitutional petition in the circumstances. \ R \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. v. SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2014 PLC 416
• AGILITY LOGISTICS (PVT.) LIMITED v. B.K. SHIPPING CO. LTD. 2014 CLD 417
• Hafiz MUHAMMAD MUBEEN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Deputy Commissioner, Sukkur 2014 MLD 419
• Mrs. SHABINA AZIZ v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLC 420
• FAL OIL COMPANY LTD. v. PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LTD. 2014 PLD 427
• SHAHID ALI LAGHARI v. State 2014 PCrLJ 427
• Pir SHER MUHAMMAD v. SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD. 2014 MLD 428
• BASHIR AHMED v. VIIITH FAMILY JUDGE, DISTRICT WEST, KARACHI 2014 YLR 429

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

jobs for advocates from Mithi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes