AGILITY LOGISTICS (PVT.) LIMITED versus B.K. SHIPPING CO. LTD.
Sections 3 and 7 of the Sindh Chief Court Rules (O Section), RR 731 and 759 Admiralty Jurisdiction to Receive Appeal Meets for Revenue, Damage and Other Charges against Building Company Disposition A lawsuit has been filed for recovery. Separate plea was allowed by the High Court under sections 731 and 759 of the Sindh Chief Court Rules (O-section) and directed to auction the cargo The plaintiff's company refused to release the goods to the defendant because he had Only the partner had the receipt and did not present the bill. Proof of quantity and condition of the goods was a proof of the quantity and condition of the goods as it was the receipt of the goods by the shipowner or the owner of the ship and the shipowner's receipt of the goods while the ship was being taken with it. Was received by the recipient. The partner's holder was entitled to issue a leadership bill bill or someone else filed a claim with the shipowner and there was no payment issue. To ship, either on the partner's receipt surcharge or the bill of the plaintiff's company was not denied that the accompanying receipt was not issued by them or the ship or someone else filed a claim in connection with the goods. Whether the defendant mentioned in the receipt of the accompaniment was not disputed and was a notified party, no notice or notice was given by the shipowner to stop the delivery of the goods by the plaintiff company and the goods As a donor, this freight payment was not worked out, there was no ground obtained by the plaintiff company that any The fur of this thing
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
