HYDABYBIA TEXTILE MILS LIMITED versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LIMITED
Banking Companies (Debt Recovery) Ordinance 1979 Section 8 (3) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXI, R 80 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, and XXVI Grounds for review were that in the judgment under review, the special The power of the Court was recognized by the Court in connection with the implementation of such court-ordered procedures as provided in Section Holding (), the banking companies recovered the loan ordinance, the Civil Code of 1979 , Was a disadvantage of the procedure provided for in implementing an order under 1908. And reservation by the Supreme Court of the auction confirmation power, as distinguished by the sale confirmation. Both of these were within the purview of the Court under section 8 (3), Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance 1979, in the case of execution of the decree, they were ignored or withheld from sale. It had no effect. The provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, were to be governed by a revision of the express provisions, and a case for review was presented in the circumstances when the second review petition was heard under the objection to the applicant's location. Will go Such a request
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Chak Jhumra lawyer