MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE versus PUNJAB APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) dismissed employees' appeal for unauthorized absence of employees. The Controller Authority dismissed the dismissal of the employees and ordered their reinstatement, with all the benefits, upheld the decision of the Appellate High Court in the Labor Court / Constitutional petition, while retaining the applicant's position, the employee was in industrial relations. The ordinance had nothing to do with its meaning and since such a Labor court had no jurisdiction to maintain its grievance request, the proceeding to dismiss and the legality of the dismissal order. Argued for the relief he had requested from the Labor Court leave Inch After arriving at the High Court to the conclusion that I was allowed to check that the employee was not employed and therefore had no labor court. The jurisdiction to disperse his plea, it should also abolish the orders of the Labor Court The Labor Appellate Tribunal and it had no jurisdiction to grant any relief to the employees.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Feroz Watan lawyer