MUHAMMAD MUJTABA KHAN versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, F.I.A.
Rules of Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 2 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) It is argued that the applicant was serving in grade 5, and the deputy director who appointed him The showcase notice was issued, he was not an authorized officer. Therefore, the entire proceeding was thwarted, on the other hand it was claimed that the showcase notice was issued by the deputy director who was the authentic officer and the defendant's standing order Was not presented to legally authorized respondents, no order was issued even before the service tribunal. The permission to appeal the officer was denied before the Supreme Court to show that the deputy director was not authorized
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Dandot lawyer
