Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus ALLAH DITTA

The Government Lands (Punjab) 's Colonization Act 1912 Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) claims for the claim of ownership rights in the right of the applicant to claim that the specific cover in the village population is in the interest of their predecessor. Was. And that the two specific orders of the date on which they were approved were not banned, the three courts below the dismissed applicants. The Court of Appeal obtained permission from the courts below that the applicants were unable to prove that they had Ihata in the interest of the predecessor. The respondents were in the interest of the applicants and over time they became dependent and as the respondents were merely the owners of the Malba record, it shows that the defendants took precautions and orders, but the applicants did not. Showed no interest in interfering. In their capacity as owners, the litigation concluded the fact that the applicants themselves were not as clear as no case was made for interference with regard to their own title. The leave was denied registration advocate from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer